The Corruption of the United Nations
As it happened, the Partition Plan proposal didreceive the bare minimum two-thirds majority – but onlybecause the Zionist lobby, with the assistance of a hit-squad of 26 American senators and a highly placed asset in the White House, bullied, bribed and blackmailed the representatives, and in one case the president, of a number of member states.
Fourwere persuaded to change their “No” votes to“Yes”, and another sevenwere persuaded to change their “No”votes to abstention. But even that was not enough to guarantee the necessary two-thirds majority. Zionism’s last minute calculations on the eve of the twice-postponed vote indicated the need to turn threemore “No” votes into “Yes” votes. The countries thenre-targeted for a final round ofdiplomatic terrorism wereLiberia, the Philipines andHaiti.
It was when President Truman was made aware of Zionism’s last minute efforts to bend the world body to its willthat he gave written vent to his view that if they continued with their pressures, the Zionists would succeedin putting the UN out of business.
If Truman had been fully briefed (we don’t know whether he was or not), he would also known that, without the consent of the majority in Palestine (the Arabs), the UN possessed no authorityto decide to partition the land, or to assign any part of it to a minority of mainly alien immigants in order that they might establish a state of their own.
In effect the United Nations was puttting itself above and beyond international law. A UN sub-committee recognised this fact and submitted a draft resolution instructing Secretary General Trygve Lie to transmit the partition resolution to the International Court of Justice in the Haque. He did not do so because the instructing draft resolution was defeated – by 21 votes to 20.
Most people in the mainly Gentile Judeo-Christian world still believe that Israel was given its birth certificate and thus legitimacy by the Partition Resolution of 29 November 1947. This is nonsense.
- Leaving aside the fact that the UN did not have the authority to decide to partition Palestine, the General Assembly resolution was only a proposal– meaning that it could have no effect, would not become policy, unless approved by the Security Council.
- The truth is that the General Assembly’s partition proposal never went to the Security Council for consideration. Why not? Because the US knew that, if approved, it could only be implemented by force; and President Truman was not prepared to use force to partition Palestine.
- So the partition plan was vitiated (becameinvalid)and the question of what the hell to do about Palestinewas taken back to the General Assembly for more discussion. The option favoured and proposed by the US was temporary UN Trusteeship. It was while the General Assembly was debating what do that Israel unilaterally declared itself to be in existence – actually in defiance of the will of the organised international community, including the Truman administration.
The truth of the time was that Israel, which, as I’ve said, came into being mainly as a consequence of Zionism terrorism and ethnic cleansing, had no right to exist and, more to the point,could have no right to exist UNLESS….. Unless it was recognised and legitimizedby those who were dispossessed of their land and their rights during the creation of the Zionist state.In international law only the Palestinians could give Israel the legitimacy it craved. And that legitimacy was the only thing the Zionists could not take from the Palestinians by force.
Truman’s fears proved to be well founded. The UN failed its first big test, and because of its handling of the Palestineproblem, it was on its way, when it was not much more than three years old, to being “put out of business.”
In Volume Two of my book there’s a chapter with the title Goodbye to the Security Council’s Integrity. It follows two chapters on the 1967 war.
The mainly Gentile Judeo-Christian world was conditioned to believe that Israel went to war in June of that year either because the Arabs attacked (that was Israel’s first assertion)or because they were going to attack.The now fully documented truth about that war can be simply stated. The Arabs did notattack and werenot intending to attack.
Page 2 of 4 | Previous page | Next page